|
Feel free to
use this letter as the basis for your own letter and to emphasize
the points you feel that are particularly important.
We suggest
that you use this opportunity to cut and paste the letter below
onto your own letterhead and add any other points that you feel
are relevant.
If possible,
please send us a copy of your letter to info@socialinvestment.ca
To send your
letter, email to pension@fin.gc.ca
Attention: Diane Lafleur
Financial Sector Policy Branch
, Department of Finance
L’Esplanade Laurier
, 20th floor East Tower
140 O’Connor St.
Ottawa ON K1A 0G5
Dear Ms. Lafleur:
Re:
Consultation on defined benefit pension plans and the
Pension Benefits Standards
Act
I am writing in response to your request for
comments on regulatory and legislative issues regarding defined
benefit pension plans under the federal Pension Benefits Standards
Act (PBSA).
I believe that your consultation paper on
regulatory issues misses two key issues. It fails to discuss the
importance of requiring pension funds under PBSA to disclose their
social and environmental policies and practices; and it fails to
raise the issue of disclosure of proxy voting policies and voting
records by pension funds.
Increasingly,
there is a consensus in the investment community that social and
environmental factors are critically important in avoiding risk
and adding long-term portfolio value. I believe that
fiduciaries must incorporate social and sustainability
analysis into their portfolio assessments in order to be
responsible managers. Yet, in spite of this, pension plan
members still have no right of access to information on how their
plans incorporate – or fail to incorporate – such strategies.
This is an important deficiency in pension plan accountability and
transparency.
Similarly, I believe that pension
funds have a fiduciary duty to vote their shares on behalf of
their plan members. This fiduciary duty is only meaningful if it
is accountable, and the accountability mechanism is through the
trustees that oversee the plans. Without disclosure of voting
policies and records, pension plan members and their trustees have
no way of knowing if plans are in fact acting according to their
fiduciary duty when voting their shares. Transparency on voting
policies and records is essential.
Therefore I
would like to support the Social Investment Organization in its
brief to you of Aug. 25, in which it has called for regulatory
change to require pension funds under the PBSA to disclose their
social and environmental policies and to make public their voting
policies and voting records.
Social
and environmental disclosure would ensure that pension funds
consider the importance of critical long-term, non-financial
factors as part of their risk management and value-added
strategies. Proxy voting disclosure would require PBSA-pension
funds to review their policies on their voting obligations, and to
vote their shares in accordance with those policies.
Such
disclosure would help to improve returns at PBSA pension funds and
to improve the overall level of accountability and transparency
among Canadian pension funds.
Sincerely,
Back
to news and archives
|