
The Senate
Committee reviewing new shareholder rights legislation will write
its report over the summer -- putting the issue into the House of
Commons this fall.
In
March the federal government introduced Bill S-19, an act to amend
the Canada Business Corporations Act. According to the Social
Investment Organization and shareholder rights groups, the bill
continues to discriminate against investors making shareholder
proposals to companies on social and environmental matters. This is
the result of wording in the act that continues to enable management
to reject shareholder proposals for “general economic, political,
racial, religious, social or similar causes" unless the
shareholder can prove that the proposal substantially affects the
business or affairs of the corporation.
This
wording gives management the right to reject proposals and force
shareholders to defend their proposals in court, said SIO Executive
Director Eugene Ellmen. "Because of the costs of such action,
the wording effectively gives management arbitrary power to exclude
proposals," he said.
A similar clause
has been used several times as grounds for refusing to circulate a
shareholder proposal, particularly since 1987 when the Ontario Court
of Appeal, in Re Varity Corp.
and Jesuit Fathers of Upper Canada et al upheld Varity's
decision not to circulate a shareholder proposal on disinvestment
from South Africa. This decision has had a major dampening effect on
the shareholder process in Canada. This is particularly striking
when you look at the flowering of active shareholdership in the US.
Most recently, the clause was used to reject a resolution filed last
year with Talisman Energy asking for information on Talisman’s
activities in Sudan.
Ellmen
said the issue likely will move to the House of Commons in the fall
when the Senate Banking Trade and Commerce Committee reports on
hearings it held this spring on the Bill.
"At
that time we'll ask our members to once again step up their efforts
to contact local MPs and cabinet ministers to show their support for
a more open shareholder process," he said.
For
information, see SIO’s
brief to the Senate

Back
to news and archives