
The
Ethical Funds Company has released its 2004 Proxy Voting Guidelines,
which include new measures to address corporate governance issues
and help restore investor confidence. At the same time, it also
reaffirmed its call for new rules that would require mutual funds to
disclose their voting practices and policies.
"It's
time that Canadian mutual funds were clear with investors about how
they use proxy voting power to influence corporate direction,"
says Don Rolfe, CEO of The
Ethical Funds Company. "We release our proxy voting
guidelines because investors have the right to know how their money
is being used to encourage good corporate governance and corporate
social responsibility."
Proxy
voting allows investors to influence companies by electing directors
to the board and voting on major proposals impacting corporate
governance practices, business ethics, and strategic direction.
The
United States Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) now requires
mutual funds in the US to disclose proxy voting policies and
procedures. This allows investors to evaluate the commitment of
their mutual fund to good corporate governance. Although there is no
such regulation in Canada, unit holders in this country would
benefit if mutual funds would voluntarily disclose how they are
voting at company annual general meetings. The Social Investment
Organization is calling on the Ontario Securities Commission to
implement similar rules in Canada.
"Sunlight
is the best disinfectant," said David Beatty, Managing Director
of the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance and Professor at
Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics and Board Effectiveness at the
Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto. "By
disclosing proxy voting guidelines the public can be sure that
mutual funds are voting proxies in a manner that serves investors,
the corporation, and market integrity. The
Ethical Funds Company should be commended for taking a
leadership role in this regard."
Highlights from The Ethical Funds Company 2004
Proxy Voting Guidelines include:
 |
Support
for proposals to make Audit, Compensation, and Nominating
Committees function independently of Management;
|
 |
Support
for proposals to allow shareholders to nominate directors
rather than forcing shareholders to vote only for or against
company nominees;
|
 |
Clear
guidelines for voting against company nominees when the Board
has not responded to shareholder proposals approved by a
majority vote;
|
 |
Support
for proposals requiring companies to disclose and fully
explain executive compensation to shareholders;
|
 |
Support
for establishing a Code of Business Ethics and Business
Conduct as well as notification to shareholders if the Board
decides to waive the Code under any circumstance;
|
 |
Support
for proposals to reduce corruption in developing countries by
requiring oil and gas and mining companies to disclose how
revenue flows impact local communities;
|
 |
Support
for proposals calling for companies to disclose contributions
made to political parties and the rationale for making each
contribution;
|
 |
Support
for proposals calling upon banks to avoid reputational damage
by adopting World Bank environmental guidelines when
evaluating resource extraction projects. |