|
The Social
Investment Organization is continuing to press for new federal rules
to increase the transparency of national pension funds on social and
environmental issues and shareholder voting.
The SIO launched
its Right to Know campaign in August in response to a federal
consultation on defined-benefit pension plans under the federal
Pension Benefits Standards Act (PBSA).
SIO asked its
members to write letters of support for the initiative, and many of
its members responded with letters of support.
The consultation
officially concluded on Sept. 15, but SIO Executive Director Eugene
Ellmen said the SIO will continue to press the federal government
for transparency reforms.
In
its brief, the SIO calls for regulations that would require pension
plans to disclose their social and environmental policies, as well
as their proxy voting policies and voting records. The social and
environmental disclosure rules are similar to recent legislation in
the UK, France and Germany. The proxy voting rules are similar to
rules now in effect for mutual funds in Canada and the United
States.
A
number of SIO members supported this position.
“I
believe that fiduciaries must incorporate social, ethical, and environmental
analysis into their portfolio assessments to reduce risk on the
investments, and promote are more sustainable future for the world
we all live in,” said Gary Hawton, CEO of Meritas Financial Inc.
“Pension plans around the world have been much more visionary with
these types of issues, yet the PBSA has failed to even look at
these issues with this consultation.”
“Pension
plan members have a right to know if and how their plans consider
social and environmental performance in the management of their
pension money,” states a brief signed by Michael Jantzi, Rob Gross
and Kevin Ranney of Jantzi Research Inc. “Similarly, plan members
have a right to know the proxy voting policies and voting records of
their plans. Currently there is a lack of transparency in both of
these areas, and the review of the PBSA provides an
opportunity to address this problem.”
The
consultation document and record of comments is available at http://www.fin.gc.ca/news05/05-037e.html.
Back
to news and archives
|